tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post774244176981304876..comments2023-11-25T04:47:25.824-06:00Comments on Debunking Creationism: Real Geology vs. “Flood Geology” via eSkepticAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07163302778654874895noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-90288704824246857372020-11-24T22:02:04.356-06:002020-11-24T22:02:04.356-06:00I'm curious to find out what blog platform you...I'm curious to find out what blog platform you're utilizing? I'm experiencing some minor security issues with my latest blog and I would like to find something more safe. Do you have any solutions?erectile dysfunction natural remedieshttps://besterectiledysfunctionpills.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-61718889769995914582020-11-24T21:58:32.574-06:002020-11-24T21:58:32.574-06:00It's an amazing post designed for all the web ...It's an amazing post designed for all the web viewers; they will take advantage from it I am sure.dysfunctionhttps://besterectiledysfunctionpills.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-37968655068412424532018-05-24T12:06:40.896-05:002018-05-24T12:06:40.896-05:00That's exactly what the authors you are refere...That's exactly what the authors you are referencing are doing. Bias much?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11344398511171293866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-4609808777167961172018-05-24T12:05:17.590-05:002018-05-24T12:05:17.590-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11344398511171293866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-31678968200168174142018-05-24T12:02:28.210-05:002018-05-24T12:02:28.210-05:00This whole post is crap. This whole post is crap. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11344398511171293866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-32903451443573993052017-12-12T22:19:36.322-06:002017-12-12T22:19:36.322-06:00People will believe what they want of course. Me? ...People will believe what they want of course. Me? I choose to believe the truth of God and what His Holy Word tells us .... that at one point He was sorry for creating man because we were bent on sinning, so He decided to destroy all life on Earth except for the only righteous man He could find ... and His family. By the way something similar is ready to go down again. Yes God is love but He's also filled with wrath for what the whole world has become. This is what we are soon to be 'saved' from ... that is if you have accepted the only provision that God has provided .. the blood of Jesus.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-45140046361279575072016-08-03T12:19:50.559-05:002016-08-03T12:19:50.559-05:00Hi, We should feel sorry for these people who clai...Hi, We should feel sorry for these people who claim God doesn't exist or the flood didn't happen worldwide.r1xlxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07404657645199233938noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-88275445346740277332016-08-03T12:18:51.740-05:002016-08-03T12:18:51.740-05:00Are you aware of have even an inkling of how worms...Are you aware of have even an inkling of how worms prove that Earth is young and The Flood really was was worldwide event just 4,400 years ago?r1xlxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07404657645199233938noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-56411919450134415902015-01-09T02:58:43.849-06:002015-01-09T02:58:43.849-06:00If you do not believe in God... I feel very sorry ...If you do not believe in God... I feel very sorry for your dumb ass xD lolAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-3926298605188965712014-12-10T15:27:10.987-06:002014-12-10T15:27:10.987-06:00Ok. But what's filled the empty space undern...Ok. But what's filled the empty space underneath where mountain ranges now are. Whole continents even? Does the corresponding drop in the sea floor match the rise of land mass the last billion years? Was the world once a shallow sea, no mountains, no continents, no deep sea floor? How shallow? To shallow to prevent a vapor atmosphere? And which came first, water or sky? What kind of weather would that have produced? This and endless other questions to this point remain. Id like to see a time model of how the altitude of earths geography has changed since the earth was supposedly a single continent to comprehend the seeminly foolish notions of geologists that disprove the flood. Kinda seems geologists and Bible beaters are both "unscientifically" religious to their own dogmatic views. Neither can really explain much of anything. Both claim to know. How foolish to presume with as little we really know. I can tell you one thing as fact. The pair of sissors I own was manufactured by some endeavor of mankind I have never witnessed. Can you prove me wrong? I can in the same way recognize a bigger hand at work in all of nature and geology. How and when no one can fathom or ever see.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-91280418143532917042014-10-17T15:55:42.830-05:002014-10-17T15:55:42.830-05:00It's interesting Ken that you write an encyclo...It's interesting Ken that you write an encyclopedia-length essay with no paragraph breaks, hinting that there's science behind your position, then you link to an "institute" that requires its "scientists" to sign a statement of faith declaring any evidence that contradicts scripture (itself riddled with contradictions and errors) is automatically wrong -- before they even see the evidence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-3772165672676950232014-10-17T15:50:41.208-05:002014-10-17T15:50:41.208-05:00You contradict yourself, Zuma. The fossils you de...You contradict yourself, Zuma. The fossils you describe are found much higher than the mammalian fossils "flood geologists" claim must be found on top of the marine fossils. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-41820363672084814052014-10-15T00:31:27.023-05:002014-10-15T00:31:27.023-05:00I won't waste too much time or energy refuting...I won't waste too much time or energy refuting this hypocritical tripe. The claim that an all creationist band of geologists collectively abandoned creationism in the light of newfound hard evidence constitutes a humongous generalization that bears little resemblance to historical fact. I'm afraid the story is a lot more complicated than that. Research Hutton, Playfair and Lyells in conjunction with Lamarck, Blythe, and Darwin to see what I mean. Either the author's grasp on history isn't any better than those he ridicules or he is being purposely deceptive. Furthermore, the assertion that creationist geologists with legitimate training and real experience no longer exist is utter fallacy; contrary to popular opinion, they do indeed exist to this day. On another note, I counter the authors hypocritical statement identifying creationists as contemptuous "cherry-pickers" with this challenge: Show me a uniformitarian or naturalist who doesn't propagate evidence supporting their argument while underemphasizing or omitting that which doesn't, and I'll show you the mystically perfect being who doesn't cherry-pick because he doesn't exist. Show me an example of evolution that isn't a mere instance of speciation; bring to my attention one credible transitional fossil; Relay to me a fact proving the validity of macroevolution that is not merely a disguised supposition or inference based on indirect evidence; introduce me to someone who can realistically demonstrate that their "knowing" that molecules to man macroevolution is indeed fact and not actually based on blind faith; and I'll shut my mouth and go home. And for the love of God, please stop perpetuating the false idea that certainty is obtainable when dealing with unobservable (therefore untestable) theories; in such cases, all you have are probabilities, and don't deny that your presuppositions decide your interpretation of the evidence. My advice to curious readers is to put on their big boy/girl pants and research BOTH sides of the origins debate. Don't ridicule the faith of those who say they believe in God and answer an inquiry of why with "because the Bible tells me so" and then justify a belief in atheistic evolution by spouting "because the scientists tell me so." Here's a link to get you started: http://www.icr.org/creation-geology/. If you choose not to research the issue and conclude for yourself but rather prefer to sheepishly rely on biased people like the author of this article to tell you what you believe, then your opinion has no value anyway; consequently, your glib comments demonstrating your superficial understanding will continue to reveal you to be an ignoramus.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18019044576419779670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-80435606217624384392013-11-08T13:21:53.134-06:002013-11-08T13:21:53.134-06:00Seashells on mountain tops can be explained by pla...Seashells on mountain tops can be explained by plate tectonics. Continental collisions are what formed such mountain ranges as the Himalayas. When the two continents collided, it brought up the sea floor (as depicted in the gif that was provided above). There are mounds of evidence to support plate tectonics. Starting with the answer and working backward is a very ineffective method of inquiry, which is what you've done here in immediately assuming seashells were atop the mountain as a result of a worldwide flood.. I definitely suggest studying plate tectonics with an open mind and you will discover how easy it really is to grasp.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-17811353782904075902013-10-06T15:49:33.978-05:002013-10-06T15:49:33.978-05:00this nonsense only proves your complete ignorance ...this nonsense only proves your complete ignorance of the geological processes that form mountains. Have a look at this and it becomes clear how shells can be found on mountain tops: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Mountain_by_reverse_fault.gif/220px-Mountain_by_reverse_fault.gifAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774379085714432681.post-87921268345623808122013-08-23T00:40:27.331-05:002013-08-23T00:40:27.331-05:00The website below shows the discovery of plenty of...The website below shows the discovery of plenty of seashells on mountains top:<br /><br />http://www.google.com.sg/images?hl=en-SG&q=mountain+top+seashel...<br /><br />The discovery of seashells on mountains top provides the evidence of the existence of a Great Flood in the past. The absence of sea surrounding each mountain provides the truth that it is irrational to have seashells on mountains top especially they could only be available around the sea. It is also irrational to comment that seashells could climb up the mountains to reach its top. Apparently there should be a Great Flood occurred in the past with great sea waves that had caused that mountains top to bring forth plenty of seashells.<br /><br />If there were no great flood occurred in the past, why should there be plenty of seashells located on mountains top then?<br />zumanoreply@blogger.com